Page: [1] [2] [3] |
Glenn
Forsetti Send PM Posts: 4241
Threads: 98 Mood: Godly Money: £8.24 (D) (+ Friend)
| |
15.07.05 15:55 Post #1 | [Youtube] [Hide Sig (12)] [Profile] [Quote] |
C1
Looking For Status Send PM Posts: 0
Threads: 0 Money: £0.18 (D) (+ Friend)
|
Wasn't it already introduced for Gameboy?
|
15.07.05 16:07 Post #2 | [Hide Sig (2)] [Profile] [Quote] |
Glenn
Forsetti Send PM Posts: 4241
Threads: 98 Mood: Godly Money: £8.24 (D) (+ Friend)
|
...
That's not the point. Those games were ports. This is entirely new coding.
Besides the GBC versions were utter crap.
|
15.07.05 16:14 Post #3 | [Youtube] [Hide Sig (12)] [Profile] [Quote] |
RunT
Statusless Send PM Posts: 2600
Threads: 106 Money: £29.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
Is it true, Worms on the GB (orginal) and the GBC (WWP) were just total crap.
The graphics and colour were apallwing (sp?).
But since Worms is being put onto the PSP and DS, I can see great improvment
________________
|
15.07.05 16:44 Post #4 | [Hide Sig (10)] [Profile] [Quote] |
clarkey252
At least i have chicken! Send PM
Posts: 550
Threads: 17 WA Clan: need one Mood: Glad to be back! Money: £77.70 (D) User Tax: -5% (+ Friend)
| 252
Very much so i still have the original for GB and it is so poor its not worth including it into the worms franchise!
________________
|
15.07.05 21:28 Post #5 | [©larkey252's Space] [Hide Sig (7)] [Profile] [Quote] |
RunT
Statusless Send PM Posts: 2600
Threads: 106 Money: £29.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
Very much so i still have the original for GB and it is so poor its not worth including it into the worms franchise!
I hear that mate, I reckon it's that bad it's not worth the mention let alone it actually got made
________________
|
16.07.05 03:11 Post #6 | [Hide Sig (10)] [Profile] [Quote] |
TheAbdBoy
Single Send PM Posts: 4158
Threads: 322 Money: £1844.11 (D) User Tax: -99% (+ Friend)
|
I think it would be better on the DS than the PSP, because DS has that touch screen, allowing more options for the game. The PSP is most likely being similar to the GBC/GB versions of it, bet wiith better graphics
________________
|
16.07.05 05:20 Post #7 | [Twitter] [Hide Sig (0)] [Profile] [Quote] |
Glenn
Forsetti Send PM Posts: 4241
Threads: 98 Mood: Godly Money: £8.24 (D) (+ Friend)
|
As far as I know, they're the exact same game. The difference is the medium that they're on. The PSP one has better graphics, so it will have 3d backgrounds and such. The DS will make use of the touchscreen for scrolling the map and choosing weapons. Outside of the technical differences, no other differences are known at this time.
|
16.07.05 07:08 Post #8 | [Youtube] [Hide Sig (12)] [Profile] [Quote] |
vision
Statusless Send PM Posts:
Threads: Money: £0.00 (D) (+ Friend)
|
Well, if i do ever get my PSP, i will be certain to pick up good old worms.
|
16.07.05 10:12 Post #9 | Last edited: 16.07.05 10:12 (VisioN - 1 times) |
[Hide Sig (0)] [Profile] [Quote] |
ArcBeetle
Statusless Send PM Posts: 1129
Threads: 23 Money: £1.90 (D) (+ Friend)
|
Is it true, Worms on the GB (orginal) and the GBC (WWP) were just total crap.
The graphics and colour were apallwing (sp?).
without mentioning the fact that they are very incomplete comparing with N64 version
|
16.07.05 11:23 Post #10 | [Hide Sig (9)] [Profile] [Quote] |
RunT
Statusless Send PM Posts: 2600
Threads: 106 Money: £29.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
Is it true, Worms on the GB (orginal) and the GBC (WWP) were just total crap.
The graphics and colour were apallwing (sp?).
without mentioning the fact that they are very incomplete comparing with N64 version
Of course they were imcomplete if you're comparing them to the N64 version.
The were just stupid little games you could play on a train or something, not a full console game that requires concentration.
And obvisously the graphics were 10x better on the N64.
________________
|
16.07.05 12:48 Post #11 | [Hide Sig (10)] [Profile] [Quote] |
clarkey252
At least i have chicken! Send PM
Posts: 550
Threads: 17 WA Clan: need one Mood: Glad to be back! Money: £77.70 (D) User Tax: -5% (+ Friend)
| 252
I think it would be better on the DS than the PSP, because DS has that touch screen, allowing more options for the game. The PSP is most likely being similar to the GBC/GB versions of it, bet wiith better graphics
Nah i reckon it will be the same experinace as the PC on PSP or did anyone play WA on the ps1, like that but as you say sweet graphics. Iv'e had little go of the psp and the graphics are stunning!
________________
|
20.07.05 11:11 Post #12 | [©larkey252's Space] [Hide Sig (7)] [Profile] [Quote] |
C1
Looking For Status Send PM Posts: 0
Threads: 0 Money: £0.18 (D) (+ Friend)
|
I think it would be better on the DS than the PSP, because DS has that touch screen, allowing more options for the game. The PSP is most likely being similar to the GBC/GB versions of it, bet wiith better graphics
Nah i reckon it will be the same experinace as the PC on PSP or did anyone play WA on the ps1, like that but as you say sweet graphics. Iv'e had little go of the psp and the graphics are stunning!
The playstation version sucked. YOu couldn't make maps, you couldn't change the scheme and you couldn't rope easily in it.
|
20.07.05 13:32 Post #13 | [Hide Sig (2)] [Profile] [Quote] |
Glenn
Forsetti Send PM Posts: 4241
Threads: 98 Mood: Godly Money: £8.24 (D) (+ Friend)
|
Yes, that sucked, but it was arguably the best version out of ALL the ports, except for Worms 1 on the PS.
|
20.07.05 15:52 Post #14 | [Youtube] [Hide Sig (12)] [Profile] [Quote] |
RunT
Statusless Send PM Posts: 2600
Threads: 106 Money: £29.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
The playstation version sucked. YOu couldn't make maps, you couldn't change the scheme and you couldn't rope easily in it.
Now look at W:A when that was PS1, that was much better, never thought it would grow into what it has become today for the PC
________________
|
20.07.05 17:15 Post #15 | [Hide Sig (10)] [Profile] [Quote] |
Page: [1] [2] [3] |
Your Comments: