ArcBeetle
Statusless Send PM Posts: 1129
Threads: 23 Money: £1.90 (D) (+ Friend)
|
My new sig, what do you think of it?
|
16.03.05 08:52 Post #1 | [Hide Sig (9)] [Profile] [Quote] |
emberstrife
Statusless Send PM Posts:
Threads: Money: £0.00 (D) (+ Friend)
|
Everything aside from your name on it is rather poor quality, plus, it's (rather) huge size will make people automatically move their mouse to the Hide Sig button upon seeing your posts....
Not really good, in short
|
16.03.05 14:31 Post #2 | [Hide Sig (0)] [Profile] [Quote] |
RunT
Statusless Send PM Posts: 2600
Threads: 106 Money: £29.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
It's a bit big mate, make it a bit smaller then you got yourself a pefect sig
________________
|
16.03.05 14:48 Post #3 | [Hide Sig (10)] [Profile] [Quote] |
xxfuzzballxx
Statusless Send PM Posts:
Threads: Money: £0.00 (D) (+ Friend)
|
The text effect looks good, but the rest is a copy + paste job. I see there from the anime "Medabots".
|
16.03.05 20:24 Post #4 | [Hide Sig (0)] [Profile] [Quote] |
C1
Looking For Status Send PM Posts: 0
Threads: 0 Money: £0.18 (D) (+ Friend)
|
It's too big, distorted and ugly. Nuff said.
|
16.03.05 20:56 Post #5 | [Hide Sig (2)] [Profile] [Quote] |
Zippy
Strange Send PM
Posts: 2033
Threads: 147 Mood: Paranoid Money: £3733.51 (D) Inc. Tax: 10% (+ Friend)
|
If you want people to comment on your sigs and stuff, just post a nameplate. Then post "rate my nameplate plz" in the shoutbox.
________________
|
16.03.05 21:20 Post #6 | [Hide Sig (11)] [Profile] [Quote] |
the candy man
Statusless Send PM Posts:
Threads: Money: £0.00 (D) (+ Friend)
|
if you want me to be honest
its shit
you didnt even make those images... and the quality is crap
|
16.03.05 21:36 Post #7 | [Hide Sig (0)] [Profile] [Quote] |
RunT
Statusless Send PM Posts: 2600
Threads: 106 Money: £29.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
and the quality is crap
One word / extension will answer to why that is.
.JPEG
________________
|
17.03.05 04:10 Post #8 | [Hide Sig (10)] [Profile] [Quote] |
joetheeskimo5
Statusless Send PM Posts: 791
Threads: 37 Money: £2.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
Well, since you deleted the other thread and aren't "spamming" anymore , I can delete my previous post and post my opinion:
A bit pixelated, I guess the text effect is nice.
|
18.03.05 01:52 Post #9 | [Hide Sig (2)] [Profile] [Quote] |
C1
Looking For Status Send PM Posts: 0
Threads: 0 Money: £0.18 (D) (+ Friend)
|
and the quality is crap
One word / extension will answer to why that is.
.JPEG
I agree with you completely Runt.
|
18.03.05 22:07 Post #10 | [Hide Sig (2)] [Profile] [Quote] |
joetheeskimo5
Statusless Send PM Posts: 791
Threads: 37 Money: £2.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
and the quality is crap
One word / extension will answer to why that is.
.JPEG
I agree with you completely Runt.
Hm..does the JPEG format try to smooth the edges or something? How come it would cause a loss in quality?
|
21.03.05 02:46 Post #11 | [Hide Sig (2)] [Profile] [Quote] |
RunT
Statusless Send PM Posts: 2600
Threads: 106 Money: £29.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
I dunno really, it does a little (alot) doesn't it.
If JPEG were like PNG, this would be a hell of alot eaiser to judge
________________
|
21.03.05 05:33 Post #12 | [Hide Sig (10)] [Profile] [Quote] |
Zogger!
Looking For Status Send PM Posts: 3954
Threads: 62 Money: £93.82 (D) (+ Friend)
|
Hm..does the JPEG format try to smooth the edges or something? How come it would cause a loss in quality?
JPEG is a lossy format, meaning that in order to compress the file, it uses compression algorithms that help make the amount of data required smaller. I'd assume one way it does this is taking some quality out of the image by approximating certain parts, so less data actually needs to be compressed. Not big on my knowledge of JPEG compression though.
________________
You know I'm a dancing machine |
21.03.05 17:48 Post #13 | [Hide Sig (8)] [Profile] [Quote] |
C1
Looking For Status Send PM Posts: 0
Threads: 0 Money: £0.18 (D) (+ Friend)
|
That seems about right zog.
|
21.03.05 20:42 Post #14 | [Hide Sig (2)] [Profile] [Quote] |
Your Comments: