RunT
Statusless Send PM Posts: 2600
Threads: 106 Money: £29.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
Right, I'm thinking of getting / buying a new disk defragmenter for my computer.
Cause lets face facts here. Microsoft's one is crap. *Ahem*
So.. any suggetions or opinions on which one you guys think is best? Bit of a stupid question but ah well.
If it helps, it helps. Tea why!
________________
|
27.02.06 23:30 Post #1 | [Hide Sig (10)] [Profile] [Quote] |
Pioneer322
Orangie Orgy Send PM
Posts: 2375
Threads: 38 Mood: FFFFFFFFFFF Money: £1289.13 (D) User Tax: -322% (+ Friend)
|
Yeah, im gonna need one too, microsofts takes days literally
Free or trial, as long as its effective and works
|
27.02.06 23:41 Post #2 | [Hide Sig (2)] [Profile] [Quote] |
xskatex
Statusless Send PM Posts:
Threads: Money: £0.00 (D) (+ Friend)
|
alright, i found a good site, it shows some of the best "system utilities softwares", comparing, rating, all of the best. I dont know much about "defraggers" but you can trust the consumer ratings.
|
28.02.06 00:05 Post #3 | [Hide Sig (0)] [Profile] [Quote] |
RunT
Statusless Send PM Posts: 2600
Threads: 106 Money: £29.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
alright, i found a good site, it shows some of the best "system utilities softwares", comparing, rating, all of the best. I dont know much about "defraggers" but you can trust the consumer ratings.
And the website is? Would be good to post it
________________
|
28.02.06 00:54 Post #4 | [Hide Sig (10)] [Profile] [Quote] |
emberstrife
Statusless Send PM Posts:
Threads: Money: £0.00 (D) (+ Friend)
|
There are two main defragmenters out there, by editor's rating and people's opinion alike - Diskeeper and PerfectDisk The latter has a little more functions, and is generally more comfortable to use, which is why i'd recommend it. Norton Disc Doctor is(or used to be) pretty decent, too.
|
28.02.06 13:42 Post #5 | [Hide Sig (0)] [Profile] [Quote] |
routine_error
Statusless Send PM Posts: 1081
Threads: 25 Money: £6.36 (D) (+ Friend)
|
i dont see whats wrong with microsoft's
unless you guys are still using windows 9x
|
01.03.06 01:03 Post #6 | [Hide Sig (1)] [Profile] [Quote] |
xskatex
Statusless Send PM Posts:
Threads: Money: £0.00 (D) (+ Friend)
|
omg lol, i must have forgot to post it, o well. i think i lost it by now. damn (slaps self in head)
|
01.03.06 15:05 Post #7 | [Hide Sig (0)] [Profile] [Quote] |
kikumbob
om nom nom nom nom Send PM Posts: 1473
Threads: 38 Mood: Effervescent Money: £80.00 (D) (+ Friend)
|
i dont see whats wrong with microsoft's
unless you guys are still using windows 9x
Same. Apart from the fact that it does take about 12 hours to defrag. It does go faster in safe mode though.
I'm slightly shocked from when I analyzed the hard drive on my friends computer and the chart thing was almost completly red.
|
01.03.06 20:33 Post #8 | [Hide Sig (9)] [Profile] [Quote] |
HarrY
poo! Send PM Posts: 3124
Threads: 75 Mood: Headshooterising modd. (CSS) Money: £2287.88 (D) User Tax: 10% (+ Friend)
|
I really don't see what's so bad about Microsofts, and I don't really care. It doesn't spend alot of time defragging either-mainly because I defragment more frequently than your average user and it doesn't take along time atall, really.
But yeah,. perfect disk is a good disk defragger I have heard from many people.
________________
|
01.03.06 21:22 Post #9 | [Wormopoly!] [Hide Sig (13)] [Profile] [Quote] |
RunT
Statusless Send PM Posts: 2600
Threads: 106 Money: £29.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
But what I'm really looking for is something that defrags, and places files and clusters in easier access places.
Which makes the hard drive work more efficently and quieter.
________________
|
02.03.06 15:28 Post #10 | [Hide Sig (10)] [Profile] [Quote] |
Your Comments: