|
BTForum
» BlameTheOffTopic Forums
» BlameTheGeneralOffTopic
» Microsoft makes promises on the new Longhorn OS Page: [1] [2] |
satside
SatSided Send PM
Posts: 12
Threads: 2 WA Clan: s0 Money: £173.09 (D) (+ Friend)
|
For the past several years, Microsoft has been promising that Longhorn would deliver some substantial security, reliability and performance improvements.
But until the worldwide partner conference in Minneapolis in mid-July, company officials had not quantified the benefits that Longhorn — the version of the Windows client operating system, due in 2006 — would deliver.
Amy Stephan, a senior product manager with the Windows client unit, outlined some of the various Longhorn "fundamentals," including systems management and deployment features, which Microsoft is readying.
Stephan told conference attendees that Longhorn will:
launch applications 15 percent faster than Windows XP does
boot PCs 50 percent faster than they boot currently and will allow PCs to resume from standby in two seconds
allow users to patch systems with 50 percent fewer reboots required
reduce the number of system images required by 50 percent
enable companies to migrate users 75 percent faster than they can with existing versions of Windows.
The technologies which will deliver these enhancements have yet to be unveiled in full. But much of that functionality should, at least in theory, be part of Longhorn Beta 1, which is expected to go out to testers by early August. Microsoft said recently that it is planning to provide a refresh of the Beta 1 bits by mid-September at the Professional Developers Conference. Beta 2 isn't slated until some time in the first half of 2006, however. Beta 2 will be the first wide-scale Longhorn beta release to feature the new Aero user interface.
The final Longhorn release is still due in the latter half of 2006, company officials reiterated at the partner conference.
Stephan said Microsoft's goal is to allow administrators to install Longhorn on new systems in 15 minutes.
In addition, Microsoft is planning to provide a single, common scanning tool that will allow Longhorn users to check on their patch state. The Windows client team also is working on improving Longhorn's patch discovery and reporting capabilities, and is planning on enabling patches to be applied directly to the aforementioned system images.
Longhorn will allow users to customize the help system with their own annotations; provide new "guided recovery" help for "unbootable" systems; and deliver improved, proactive diagnostics for things such as hard-drive failure, battery-life and other performance-related features, she said.
On the security front, Longhorn will deliver more than a dozen new security enhancements, Stephan said. Microsoft officials have discussed most, if not all, of these features over the past couple of years. New security features slated for Longhorn include everything from Network Access Protection quarantining and browser lock-down, to protected user accounts and anti-malware protection, over the past couple of years.
"Our preliminary research shows that Longhorn will help drive down costs in administering and managing PCs," Stephan concluded. "It will lower security, deployment, administration and support costs" in a way that hasn't been seen since the company delivered Windows 95 ten years ago."
At the partner show, Microsoft execs showed off Longhorn client build 5086, a pre-beta release that went to selected Technology Adoption Program participants earlier this month. They also demonstrated a Longhorn feature called "Meeting Space" that is designed to allow users to conduct impromptu meetings via P2P.
As of late, company officials have taken to describing the three Cs in Longhorn, meaning the three buckets of features that are part of the core operating system. In the "confidence" bucket are all kinds of security and manageability features. In the "creative" one are technologies, such as like browse/search/subscribe (Internet Explorer and RSS) and the forthcoming user interface. And in the "connected" bucket are features like Meeting Space and synch technology for plugging in wireless devices of all kinds.
Source: Microsoft Watch
I hope all those features are true because speed improvements comparisons between Windows XP and Windows 98 satside$1are obsolete due to all those unnecessary graphics improvements that windows XP came with.
I also liked to congratulate all BTP admins for the excellent work they have been doing, i'm an old worms player of a former Bulgarian Clan, I have returned playing 2 weeks ago, lol, I loved this webpage.
Sat_Side
________________
|
20.07.05 14:03 Post #1 | [Hide Sig (0)] [Profile] [Quote] |
pimp_popo
Statusless Send PM Posts:
Threads: Money: £0.00 (D) (+ Friend)
|
HI SAT!
Nice to see old pal startig again.im also a old wormer that reestarted 5 days ago,lol.by the way thx for the longhorn info Sat
|
20.07.05 14:12 Post #2 | Last edited: 20.07.05 14:28 (pimp_popo - 1 times) |
[Hide Sig (0)] [Profile] [Quote] |
satside
SatSided Send PM
Posts: 12
Threads: 2 WA Clan: s0 Money: £173.09 (D) (+ Friend)
|
lol, didn't know u were here too pimp.popo , wow, those great times 2 years ago , lol, also played with sfnords yesterday hmmm it seems that WA is still alive
________________
|
20.07.05 14:19 Post #3 | [Hide Sig (0)] [Profile] [Quote] |
MC
Statusless Send PM Posts: 411
Threads: 15 Money: £120.71 (D) (+ Friend)
|
LMAO
In all this Security-Suff might must be the TCPA!
Dont let it take over you PC!
The best Way to avoid it: Using LINUX
|
20.07.05 15:32 Post #4 | [Hide Sig (1)] [Profile] [Quote] |
Glenn
Forsetti Send PM Posts: 4241
Threads: 98 Mood: Godly Money: £8.24 (D) (+ Friend)
|
allow users to patch systems with 50 percent fewer reboots required
So what? We're only going to have to reboot our systems once with each update instead of twice? That's still rebooting the system.
It doesn't really matter what Microsoft promises, what matters is what the finished product looks like. Some of this sounds too good to be true.
|
20.07.05 15:57 Post #5 | [Youtube] [Hide Sig (12)] [Profile] [Quote] |
ArcBeetle
Statusless Send PM Posts: 1129
Threads: 23 Money: £1.90 (D) (+ Friend)
|
I hope that Long Horn isnt worse than XP.
Because some of my friends say that XP is worse than 98 for the fact its more infectable by trojans, virus and such stuff
I hope they are lying
|
20.07.05 16:47 Post #6 | Last edited: 20.07.05 16:47 (ArcBeetle - 1 times) |
[Hide Sig (9)] [Profile] [Quote] |
RunT
Statusless Send PM Posts: 2600
Threads: 106 Money: £29.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
allow users to patch systems with 50 percent fewer reboots required
So what? We're only going to have to reboot our systems once with each update instead of twice? That's still rebooting the system.
It doesn't really matter what Microsoft promises, what matters is what the finished product looks like. Some of this sounds too good to be true.
Your writing is disgracful Glenn *slps wrist*
Anyways, Longhorn is supposed to be more secure than XP, but it's built the same way as XP so how will the manage that?
Longhorn will be a good OS but it's just taking them ages to develop it.
Last I heard it was sometime 2 years ago was it's release, then it was Summer of this year.
Who knows?
________________
|
20.07.05 17:04 Post #7 | [Hide Sig (10)] [Profile] [Quote] |
ArcBeetle
Statusless Send PM Posts: 1129
Threads: 23 Money: £1.90 (D) (+ Friend)
|
allow users to patch systems with 50 percent fewer reboots required
So what? We're only going to have to reboot our systems once with each update instead of twice? That's still rebooting the system.
It doesn't really matter what Microsoft promises, what matters is what the finished product looks like. Some of this sounds too good to be true.
Your writing is disgracful Glenn *slps wrist*
Anyways, Longhorn is supposed to be more secure than XP, but it's built the same way as XP so how will the manage that?
Longhorn will be a good OS but it's just taking them ages to develop it.
Last I heard it was sometime 2 years ago was it's release, then it was Summer of this year.
Who knows?
I know someone here in Spain who gets Windows LongHorn; but I dont know where and how did he get it
Also If you want a screenshot for know how its more or less:
Spoiler (Click to Expand)
|
20.07.05 17:12 Post #8 | Last edited: 20.07.05 17:13 (ArcBeetle - 1 times) |
[Hide Sig (9)] [Profile] [Quote] |
RunT
Statusless Send PM Posts: 2600
Threads: 106 Money: £29.56 (D) (+ Friend)
|
See, what you got a screenie of there Arc, is an Evaluation Build.
This means it's not what it's finally going to be / look like.
Besides, thats an old build anyway, 4074
________________
|
20.07.05 17:23 Post #9 | [Hide Sig (10)] [Profile] [Quote] |
ArcBeetle
Statusless Send PM Posts: 1129
Threads: 23 Money: £1.90 (D) (+ Friend)
|
See, what you got a screenie of there Arc, is an Evaluation Build.
This means it's not what it's finally going to be / look like.
Besides, thats an old build anyway, 4074
ROFL I didnt read it, I just searched the screenshots
|
20.07.05 17:28 Post #10 | [Hide Sig (9)] [Profile] [Quote] |
satside
SatSided Send PM
Posts: 12
Threads: 2 WA Clan: s0 Money: £173.09 (D) (+ Friend)
|
you can actually download the beta ISO of Windows Longhorn from microsoft page, hope it doesn't require more ram to run
________________
|
20.07.05 17:37 Post #11 | [Hide Sig (0)] [Profile] [Quote] |
Bloopy
Lazy, Busy, Fizzy, Crazy Send PM
Posts: 2996
Threads: 145 WA Clan: WwA Money: £764.65 (D) (+ Friend)
|
I hope that Long Horn isnt worse than XP.
Because some of my friends say that XP is worse than 98 for the fact its more infectable by trojans, virus and such stuff
I hope they are lying
When I changed from 98 to XP, I found XP to be infinitely better! In 98, I would get crashes all the time due to installed software clashing and all kinds of things, but now XP really only crashes when there's a hardware problem. XP is just fine, it handles programs much better.
________________
I suppose that's one "good" thing about my degree (aero engineering), there aren't too many terms/words/etc that have "alternative" meanings.
What, like cockpits, turboshafts, thrust, nozzles, corkscrews, ram drag, payload, flaps, and wind tunnels? |
21.07.05 09:31 Post #12 | [Planet Bloopy] [Hide Sig (7)] [Profile] [Quote] |
ArcBeetle
Statusless Send PM Posts: 1129
Threads: 23 Money: £1.90 (D) (+ Friend)
|
I hope that Long Horn isnt worse than XP.
Because some of my friends say that XP is worse than 98 for the fact its more infectable by trojans, virus and such stuff
I hope they are lying
When I changed from 98 to XP, I found XP to be infinitely better! In 98, I would get crashes all the time due to installed software clashing and all kinds of things, but now XP really only crashes when there's a hardware problem. XP is just fine, it handles programs much better.
Yeah for that reason I said that I hopethey are lying... I have used Windows 95,98, ME and XP, and the last one is the better
|
21.07.05 12:10 Post #13 | [Hide Sig (9)] [Profile] [Quote] |
C1
Looking For Status Send PM Posts: 0
Threads: 0 Money: £0.18 (D) (+ Friend)
|
I hope that Long Horn isnt worse than XP.
Because some of my friends say that XP is worse than 98 for the fact its more infectable by trojans, virus and such stuff
I hope they are lying
Well, it's more infectable because your friend is a retard. If he actually manages to get all those, he has to be.
Don't download retarded things.
|
21.07.05 17:49 Post #14 | [Hide Sig (2)] [Profile] [Quote] |
satside
SatSided Send PM
Posts: 12
Threads: 2 WA Clan: s0 Money: £173.09 (D) (+ Friend)
|
I think that the differences in reliability and performance between two computers both with 64 ram; one running Windows 98 and the other one running Windows XP is much easier to understand because Windows XP's minimun Ram requirements is 64MB of Ram and Windows 98's minimun requirement is 8 MB of Ram. So if you install the same OS in one computer with 64MB of ram it is much better to install Windows 98 than XP. That's the problem microsoft has been facing because, in spite of its program and file management , visual improvements in Windows XP, Windows 98 requires less computer resources to run.
So the objective of Win. Longhorn is to compatibilize both features of both Operating Systems, I think that the new Longhorn will have a brand new hard drive formatting system which may cause compatibility problems on old programs. Well I hope that they do their best to bring us a better operating system, althought all this information I continue to like windows xp operating system rather than other unstable operating systems. I dont know why a lot of my friends say that windows 2000 is the best operating system.
C1 ur right windows xp is much secure than older operating systems.
________________
|
21.07.05 18:34 Post #15 | [Hide Sig (0)] [Profile] [Quote] | Page: [1] [2] |
Post Reply
Donate to BlameThePixel:
[22 Queries, Page Loaded in 0.331771 Seconds]
|
|
Your Comments: